|
"...there is one key to profitability and stability during either a boom or a bust economy: employee morale."
Herb Kelleher, Southwest Airlines Founder
|
|
|
|
| |
| Resources
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Want to Improve Productivity?
Author :: Kevin Peternel
Date :: Thu 02/28/2008 @ 02:54
|
|
|
The following article, by Kevin Peternel, SPHR, President of The HR Effect, appeared in the Greater Madison Area SHRM Chapter In-Touch newsletter in February of 2008. It focuses on the importance of vacation time for both employee well-being and productivity.
read article
Want to Improve Productivity? Then, Make Sure Employees Take Their Vacation.
One of the many casualties of doing more with less is that employees do not do what is in the best interest of their own health. We hear or read about the medical fallout daily from national news sources. The curious can flip through the U.S. Obesity Trend slides on the Center for Disease Control web site for a visual confirmation (http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/maps/).
Due to a variety of factors, not the least of which is high corporate work expectations, nearly 50% of American workers report that their stress level has increased over the past five years, according to the American Psychological Association. And, nationally, 70% say their jobs undermine their health in terms of exercise, diet and the impact of stress. Further, according to the Center of Work-Life Policy, 1.7 million people consider the hours they work extreme. Some of the resulting health problems are certainly due to individuals own Type A personalities. However, globalization, mobile devices, and fear of losing one’s job, also contribute the stress.
Many in Human Resources have been involved with developing wellness initiatives. Most times, these initiatives have been driven by corporate health care costs. Typically, the success stories these initiatives create relate to employee weight loss or smoking cessation. After all, aren’t smoking and obesity key health care cost drivers? Yes, they are. And they are probably the most observable ones, too. Often the simplest things are subtle and overlooked. That’s where company behaviors toward vacations come in.
Most American employers provide some sort of paid vacation benefits. Employees in the U.S. do not receive nearly the benefits as do employees of much of the rest of the industrial world. Whereas, on average, U.S. employees get 14 days of vacation annually, European workers get at least 20, with 25 or even 30 or more days common in some countries. (One out of four employees in the U.S. private sector get no paid time off at all, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.)
Yet, even though the number of available vacation days is lower than the rest of the world, according to Hudson, more than 50% of Americans fail to use all of their vacation days. (According to Business Week, Americans take even less vacation than the Japanese, the people who created the term karoshi – meaning being worked to death.) Kathy Gurchiek of SHRM reported that there were four unused vacation days per employed adult age 18 and older in 2006. The top reasons U.S. workers gave for foregoing paid time off included inconvenience in having to schedule it in advance, being too busy to get away and preferring to receiving money for unused vacation time. Other top reasons include overall job pressures, working in a culture that discourages use of vacation, and feeling like no one else can adequately fill in while gone.
Yet, there is little utility in promoting a culture where employees do not take time away from work. According to the Families and Work Institute, overworked employees make more mistakes on the job, can feel anger toward employers for expecting too much, can resent coworkers who are not viewed as working as hard as they do, express lower morale and less engagement in their jobs, take more unscheduled absences (often faking sick days) and may end up looking for a new job.
In 2005, Air New Zealand wanted to know why “Americans don’t make vacation a priority.” They teamed with former NASA scientists in performing a vacation gap study of the psychological and physiological effects of vacations. Their process included attitudinal surveys, daily diary entries, and in-flight brain monitoring equipment of volunteers vacationing in New Zealand (detailed information on the study can be found at www.vacationgap.com). The study started prior to travelers departing, had continuously reporting throughout and followed up with them for a two week period after their vacation. Some of the key results were:
- On the last day of vacation, travelers demonstrated 82% better performance than prior to vacation.
- Performance for the two weeks after vacation sustained an improvement of nearly 25% compared to performance before vacation (people age 45 and older had 50% improvements).
- Travelers rated their overall health more than one full point higher (one-to-five scale) while on vacation.
- Vacationers got three times more deep sleep after their vacation. They continued to get 20 minutes more sleep post-vacation than pre-vacation.
The vacation study recommends five “excuses” employees can offer regarding going on vacation:
- When I first return from vacation, you’ll see an 82% increase in my performance.
- More than half of survey respondents reported up to a 25% increase in happiness after a vacation and nearly the same reported that their stress levels dropped by the same mount.
- After I return from vacation, there will be a lasting 25% improvement in my performance.
- Vacation leads to better health through more rejuvenating sleep – which means fewer sick days.
- After a vacation I’ll come back rested and alert – this is hard science – the study proves it.
So, what should we in Human Resources do with this information? If we are serious about wellness, here are a few starting points to changing company culture for the good of employees and for increased productivity:
- Insist that all supervisors and managers take their time to set an example.
- Make sure employees are cross trained and have systems in place for when they are on vacation.
- Expect that when people are on vacation, they do disconnect.
- Be flexible in scheduling vacation.
- Buck the trend of providing pay in lieu of time off.
Kevin Peternel, SPHR, is President of The HR Effect, LLC (www.thehreffect.com), a Madison-area Human Resources consulting and recruiting firm with particular emphasis on improving relationships within small and medium sized organizations. Phone: 608.268.6065 Web: kpeternel@thehreffect.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
5S Levels of Achievement
Author :: Kevin Peternel
Date :: Fri 05/18/2007 @ 10:15
|
|
|
5S Levels of Achievement
read article
5S Levels of Achievement
|
|
Sorting
|
Simplifying
|
Systematic Cleaning
|
Standardizing
|
Sustaining
|
|
Level
5
Focus on
Prevention
|
Cleanliness problem areas have been identified and mess prevention actions have taken place.
o
|
Needed items can be retrieved within 30 seconds and require a minimum number of steps.
o
|
Potential problems have been identified and counter-measures have been documented.
o
|
Reliable methods and standards for housekeeping, daily inspections, and work place arrangement have been shared and are used throughout like work areas.
o
|
Root causes have been eliminated and improvement actions focus on developing preventive methods.
o
|
|
Level
4
Focus on
Reliability
|
Work area has housekeeping responsibilities, schedule, and assignments are established and being followed.
o
|
Tools in work area have been minimized in number and are properly arranged for retrieval and use.
o
|
Daily inspection occurs during cleaning of equipment, tools, and supplies.
o
|
Reliable methods and standards for housekeeping, daily inspections, and work place arrangement have been documented and are followed by all members of work team.
o
|
Sources and frequency of problems are documented as part of routine work, root causes are identified, and corrective action plans are developed.
o
|
|
Level
3
Make it
Visual
|
Initial cleaning has been performed and a list of needed items for work area has been developed.
o
|
Needed items have been outlined, dedicated locations are properly labeled, and required quantities have been determined.
o
|
Visual controls and indicators have been established and marked for the work area.
o
|
Work team has documented agreements on visual controls, labeling of items, and required quantities of needed items.
o
|
Work team is routinely checking area to maintain 5S agreements.
o
|
|
Level
2
Focus on
Basics
|
Needed and not needed items have been identified and those not needed have been removed from work area.
o
|
Needed items have been safely stored and organized according to frequency of use.
o
|
Key work area items to check have been identified, and acceptable performance levels documented.
o
|
Work team has documented agreements for needed items, organization, and work area controls.
o
|
Initial 5S level has been determined, and performance has been documented, and posted in work area.
o
|
|
Level
1
Just
Beginning
|
Needed and not needed items are mixed throughout the work area.
o
|
Items are placed randomly throughout the work place.
o
|
Key work area items to be checked are not identified and are unmarked.
o
|
Work area methods are not consistently followed and are undocumented.
o
|
Work area checks are randomly performed and there is no visual measurement of 5S performance.
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Service Standards Training Module
Author :: Kevin Peternel
Date :: Fri 05/18/2007 @ 10:12
|
|
|
Service Standards Training Module
read article
Service Standards Training Module Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lean Thinking - Books
Author :: Kevin Peternel
Date :: Fri 05/18/2007 @ 10:09
|
|
|
Lean Thinking - Books
read article
Lean Thinking - Books
Liker, Jeffrey. Becoming Lean. Inside stories of U.S. manufacturers. Productivity Press, 1998.
Womack, James and Jones, Daniel. Lean Thinking. Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon and Schuster, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Follow-up Action Plan
Author :: Kevin Peternel
Date :: Thu 05/17/2007 @ 09:01
|
|
|
Follow-up Action Plan
read article
FOLLOW-UP ACTION PLAN
|
|
Who
|
Who
|
How
|
When
|
When
|
|
|
Action Steps
|
Primary Responsibility
|
Support Responsibility
|
Measure of
task
completion
|
Progress check dates
|
Completion
Date
|
Comments/ further action
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|